Photos 

< Previous   (1 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (2 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (3 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (4 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (5 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (6 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (7 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (8 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (9 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (10 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (11 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (12 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (13 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (14 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (15 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (16 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (17 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (18 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (19 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (20 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (21 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (22 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (23 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (24 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (25 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (26 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

< Previous   (27 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (28 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

< Previous   (29 of 29)   Next >

Photo taken by Historic American Engineering Record

View high-res version

Facts 

Overview
Lost cantilevered through truss over Brazos River on US 90A at Richmond
Location
Fort Bend County, Texas
Status
Removed
History
Opened July 23, 1925; parallel bridge built 1965; closed to traffic Nov. 1986; demolished July 14, 1988
Builders
- Austin Bridge Co. of Dallas, Texas (contractor)
- Charles H. Kendall (county engineer)
- Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co. of Leavenworth, Kansas (substructure)
- Virginia Bridge & Iron Co. (steel fabrication)
Design
Cantilevered through truss
Dimensions
Length of largest span: 364 ft.
Total length: 1,156 ft.
Deck width: 20 ft.
Inventory number
BH 36688 (Bridgehunter.com ID)

Categories 

Austin Bridge Co. (3)
Built 1925 (685)
Built during 1920s (4,732)
Cantilevered truss (128)
Charles H. Kendall (1)
Fort Bend County, Texas (1)
HAER documented (350)
Laced endposts (12)
Lost (1,699)
Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co. (25)
Span length 250-500 feet (592)
Texas (750)
Through truss (5,489)
Total length 1000-2500 feet (720)
Truss (16,170)
Virginia Bridge & Iron Co. (20)

Update Log 

Sources 

Comments 

Post a comment here · Contact webmaster